_edited.jpg)
And when mentioning information, I refer to relevant information either for oneself or for society. In addition to the surprise of many, these cases occur very frequently. I don't want to create conspiracy ideas or baseless theories. However, cases like the discovery of Clair Patterson, about the prohibition of lead. As a chemical harmful to humans, it is just one of thousands of cases that exist.
Therefore, how would you answer the question already posed? Getting to hide information that could be beneficial to the entire planet, however, something that prevents the growth of large companies and other people.
See ya!
Nos leemos!
I think that hiding information in the case of control of population's emotion is beneficial. Seen this in a political way, there are many cases like Petterson. Of course as an indivual, we think that is wrong, but what about people that don't have the correct information about the topic. We saw something similar during the pandemic, there were a lot of information and it made, in some locations, mass panic. That affect the control of governmet in people to develop good public policy.
As far as I concerned, it is good to hide information? Yes, as a way to control de information and develop good public policies. But of course there is a limit, such as the Petterson case, people needed to know that big companies were killing them and the environment.